still just rumors, rumors, rumors are not confirmed by official sources, but is certain is that France is to put it mildly irritated with Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and his Libya. "Sarkozy wants to shelling," he wrote to Agence France Presse, raising the discontent between Paris and Tripoli after France officially recognized the rebels as opposition forces in all respects and received representatives. In fact, writes the Nouvel Observateur, it would be ready to act on its own, without help from others Countries.
The reason that Sark would put the turbo would be fired by the threat Libyan official news agency Jana: "We are aware of a serious secret that will lead to the fall of Sarkozy's political and even legal proceedings against him that regards the financing of the 2007 electoral campaign. "
Elysée The plan would be to "hit a very limited number of points, from where the bloodiest operations" against civil aviation Gaddafi's Libya. Three points would then bombed the military airport of Sirte, 500 kilometers east of Tripoli to Sabha, in the south, near the border with Chad, and Bab al-Azyzia, the command center of Gaddafi in Tripoli.
In addition, at the suggestion of one of Libyan opposition members, France could also "to encrypt the transmission system" control of Gaddafi.
These are rumors, and even if the statements are quite another thing, suggest that the West is beginning to lose patience with Libya, but given the economic interests at stake is prevaricating. Meanwhile, Elisha was not confirmed. Officially merely to feed the journalists vague words: "We're not there yet. Meanwhile, already we have to ask permission to prevent the legal use of force by Gaddafi. "
In the absence of official statements Italy chose the quote and comment merely to say that if there will be action, "not participate in bombing raids on Libya," according to the Minister Franco Frattini said. Berlusconi put his hands forward on the recognition of the rebels: "It 's the position of a single country, hear all."
NATO for its part has avoided specific comments about the intentions of Sark, but the mouth of the Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said that any military action of NATO, will require "a clear mandate from the Security Council of the United Nations." Ramussen has specified that this new mandate would also contribute to a reinforced monitoring of the arms embargo "imposed on Libya by Resolution 1970.
Act and how then? Proved to be rather cautious Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa: "NATO has decided to instruct the commanders to prepare operational plans for any eventuality and in particular for a case only hypothesis of no-fly zones (in the various possibilities) , naval intervention to ensure compliance with the embargo, and especially the part concerning humanitarian aid. Has not been initiated when any of these options - he added - and because it does not yet have operational plans that are required today, and because there was still the accession of all countries members of NATO. "
Meanwhile the United States, concerned that Nasser might use chemical weapons against the rebels, they did know, through the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that a unilateral intervention in Libya could have "unpredictable consequences". Moreover, the U.S. has suspended relations with the embassy in Tripoli in Washington, openly pro-Gaddafi.
The reason that Sark would put the turbo would be fired by the threat Libyan official news agency Jana: "We are aware of a serious secret that will lead to the fall of Sarkozy's political and even legal proceedings against him that regards the financing of the 2007 electoral campaign. "
Elysée The plan would be to "hit a very limited number of points, from where the bloodiest operations" against civil aviation Gaddafi's Libya. Three points would then bombed the military airport of Sirte, 500 kilometers east of Tripoli to Sabha, in the south, near the border with Chad, and Bab al-Azyzia, the command center of Gaddafi in Tripoli.
In addition, at the suggestion of one of Libyan opposition members, France could also "to encrypt the transmission system" control of Gaddafi.
These are rumors, and even if the statements are quite another thing, suggest that the West is beginning to lose patience with Libya, but given the economic interests at stake is prevaricating. Meanwhile, Elisha was not confirmed. Officially merely to feed the journalists vague words: "We're not there yet. Meanwhile, already we have to ask permission to prevent the legal use of force by Gaddafi. "
In the absence of official statements Italy chose the quote and comment merely to say that if there will be action, "not participate in bombing raids on Libya," according to the Minister Franco Frattini said. Berlusconi put his hands forward on the recognition of the rebels: "It 's the position of a single country, hear all."
NATO for its part has avoided specific comments about the intentions of Sark, but the mouth of the Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said that any military action of NATO, will require "a clear mandate from the Security Council of the United Nations." Ramussen has specified that this new mandate would also contribute to a reinforced monitoring of the arms embargo "imposed on Libya by Resolution 1970.
Act and how then? Proved to be rather cautious Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa: "NATO has decided to instruct the commanders to prepare operational plans for any eventuality and in particular for a case only hypothesis of no-fly zones (in the various possibilities) , naval intervention to ensure compliance with the embargo, and especially the part concerning humanitarian aid. Has not been initiated when any of these options - he added - and because it does not yet have operational plans that are required today, and because there was still the accession of all countries members of NATO. "
Meanwhile the United States, concerned that Nasser might use chemical weapons against the rebels, they did know, through the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that a unilateral intervention in Libya could have "unpredictable consequences". Moreover, the U.S. has suspended relations with the embassy in Tripoli in Washington, openly pro-Gaddafi.
BlitzQuotidiano
0 comments:
Post a Comment