Fernando Liggio
is historically well documented that since the fifth century onwards - when the "Christianity" was able to gain absolute hegemony over all socio-cultural aspects of the vast Roman Empire and institutionalized as the undisputed official religion of the State [in accordance to the 'edict of Thessalonica "promulgated on February 27 by 380 and, in practice, enforced in 391 by order of Emperor Theodosius I (378-392)] - many" Papi, "not only have become directly responsible for horrendous atrocities, but they have also fostered significant criminal and illegal actions of any kind, so that Lord Acton (1960-1967) did not hesitate to say that" The popes were not only murderers in great style, but made a legal theory of the assassination of the Christian Church and a condition for salvation "(cf. Acton JE" Lectures on Modern History, "London, 1960," Essays in the Liberal Interpretation of History, "Chicago-London, 1967.) In this regard, it is also worth remembering that no less than 18 popes have been murdered, most of which are unambiguous for the benefit of their successors!
The "Christianity" ("Untianesimo" or "messianic") arises with all the hallmarks of a sectarian movement (1) that deviates sharply from affirming Jewish religious organization. In fact, the "Christianity", as stated in Acts of the Apostles, "begins with the traditional method of recruiting illegal and criminal purposes using coercive techniques suggestive of intimidation - often aided by the use of dangerous drugs - cleverly used by leaders to hoodwink the gullible organizers recruits. In this regard it is significant the incident, described in detail in the 'Acts of the Apostles "(IV 34-35 V and 1-11), in which the Apostle Simon Peter Head - to intimidate all to the early Christian community formerly known as just" Church "- causes the death of elderly couple Ananias and Saffi as exemplary punishment for being guilty of not having paid to the Christian communities being established so-called" Church "the entire proceeds from the sale of their farm, just allo stesso modo di come attualmente «si uccide uno spacciatore quando ha tenuto per sé una parte del guadagno» (Saviano, 2006) non consegnandolo tutto all’organizzazione criminale. Il relativo episodio è il seguente: «…o[soi gaVr kthv/tore" cwrivwn h[ oijkiw`n uJph`rcon, pwlou`nte" e[feron taV" timaV" tw`n pipraskomeVnwn kaiV ejtivqoun parav touV" povda" tw`n ajpostovlwn. […] !AnhVr dev ti" !AnaniVa" ojnoVmati suVn Sapfivrh/ th/` gunaikiV aujtou ejpwvlhsen kth`ma, kaiV ejnosfivsato ajpoV th`" timh`", suneiduivh" kaiV th`" gunaikov", kaiV ejnevgka" mevro" ti parav touv" povda" tw`n ajpostovlwn e[qhken. ei\pen deV oj Pevtro": Ajnaniva, diav tiv ejplhvrwsen satana oj `" thvn kardivan am yeuvsasqaiv to tire `ma tov tov a [gion kaivos nosofivsasqai ajpoV th` "` timh "aren` cwrivou; [...] oujk ejyeuvsw ajntrwvpoi "ajllaV tw / Qew` / `. Ajkouvnon dev janani "touver" loVgou "touvtou" peswVn ejxevyuxen. kaivos ejgevneto fovbo "mevga" ejpiV pavnta "touver" ajouvonta. "[...]. jEgevneto dev WJ" wJrw `n` n triw diavsthma kaivos HJ gunhV aujtou `MHV` eijdui the gegonoV tov "eijsh` lqen. Ajpekriqh prov dev "aujthVn Pevro "eijpev moi, eij tosouvtou tov cwrivon ajpevdosqe; HJ dev ei \\ pen: naive, tusouvtou. oj dev proof" Pevtro "aujthvn: tiv o [ti sunefwnhvqh uJmi peiravsai` n `ma tov tire Kurijou; ijdou Oij povde" tw `n qayavntwn toVn the [nádraí ejpiV sou th / `quvra / xaiV ejxoivsousivn itself. and [pesen dev paracrh `test" Touve "povda" aujtou `kaiVejxevyuxen: [...]. kaiV ejgeVneto foVbo" meVga "EJF jo [lhn thVn ejkklhsivan kaiV and [piv pavnta" Touve "ajkouovta" tau `ta ..." ( "... in fact the owners of fields or houses, they had to sell them taking the money earned and put it down at the feet of the Apostles [...].. But such a man named Ananias, along with his wife Sapphira, sold some land and kept hidden part the price of the land, knowing his wife, and the remainder presane placed it at the feet of the apostles. But Peter said, Ananias, why Satan has stolen your heart, make you lie to puff [Spirit] holy for you and keep the price of the land? [...] Have not lied to men but to God Ananias hearing these words fell down and died. It caused great fear in all who heard it. [...]. Then he spent about three hours from happening and that his wife was unknown what happened, he went. But when she came with him, Peter asked, tell me, you sold the land for that price? But she said it that far. The way Peter [said] to her, because you have agreed together to deceive the mind of the Lord [the "Feared (Elohên), Omnipotent (Sahddaj) Master (Adonaj) which is (YHAWEH) in heaven (djvô qeoV =" = deus god =) "]? Here at the door steps of those who buried your husband and will carry you out. Instantly, she fell at his feet and died! [...] And a great fear took all the church [community] and all who heard it ... ') (2). It is therefore not surprising that the managers of the "Christian Catholic Church" have been, and remain basically advocates of illegal behavior and, often, even criminal, as their true "purpose" is the psychological condition of their faithful with promises of rewards and threats of punishment and continue undeterred to convince them of the existence of an original collective guilt e di colpe individuali da scontare. I Papi tuttora, coadiuvati da un efferato sistema gerarchico, continuano ad organizzare frequentemente immensi raduni di giovani, seguendo le tecniche proprie delle “ideologie totalitarie” (al pari del nazismo, del fascismo, ecc.). per accattivarsi le loro ingenue menti immature, pertanto facilmente condizionabili, allo scopo di garantirsi la continua sussistenza nel futuro. Con i Papi, l’ideologia del movimento cristiano ― divulgata fin dall’origine come fondata sulla bontà, umiltà, rassegnazione e perdono ― in pratica non ha tardato rivelarsi sempre più «…intollerante, implacabile e minacciosa contro tutti coloro che, in un modo o nell’altro, are opposed to or, more simply, they refuse to accept it ... "(see Rich U.," Process of religions', Milan, 1979), so that its accession to the faithful requires a complete unconditional acceptance of a practice to be able to involve difficulties in socio-environmental relations secular. On the other hand, according to Matthew (XII, 30) and Luke (XI, 23) Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph), passed off as inspiration for Christianity, he said, with typical mentality paranoiacale, "Whoever is not with him is against him," in which adherents to Christianity were regarded as an enemy anyone who was not Christian. Ancora peggio, secondo Giovanni (XV, 6), Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Gesù [il “Cristo”] Figlio di Giuseppe) avrebbe affermato: “Se alcuno non rimane con me, sia gettato fuori come il sarmento e secchi, e si raccolga e si metta nel fuoco, e si bruci”! Si pensi alle conseguenze che questa affermazione ha avuto soprattutto nell’ambito della “Santa Inquisizione”! Questa posizione di forza che il cristianesimo assume contro tutto ciò che si oppone alla sua espansione appare particolarmente evidente nella lunga invettiva contro i farisei che Matteo (XXIII, da 1 a 38) pone in bocca a Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Gesù [il “Cristo”] Figlio di Giuseppe). Poiché i farisei, forming the current policy for restitution of the Jewish nation, as pointed out by Rich (1979), "... they saw, and rightly so, in early Christianity a dangerous anti-national movement that, after embezzling of their Messiah, that he had emptied of political meaning that was associated to his expectations. The rejection of the Pharisees to accept this distortion of their religion, the compilers of the Gospels respond by adding, embezzlement and defamation. [...]. If, in [the] Genesis [Old Testament], the ferocity is evident in the documents of the New Testament, it is masked by a patina of loving care that will enable the Church to pass off the most unspeakable atrocities to good works, and his priests could push their pious zeal to burn at the stake (after confiscation of assets), tens of thousands of human beings, in the pious intention of saving their souls .... " The ideology of "Christianity" ("Untianesimo" = "messianism") according to the editors of the Gospels, was aroused by Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph), regardless of whether he , if it really existed (3), the Gospel description can be considered as a revolutionary smart or as a fanatic or as a simple teomegalomane eager enthusiastic charismatic of Justice. This ideology was immediately intercepted and exploited by the ruling classes, who had an interest would affect the people in the spirit of slavish submission, in order to maintain their set-feudal hierarchy with its focus on strict regulations for the effective control of the masses. In fact, the virtues of honesty, shown off by Christianity, allowed the rich power-holders to enjoy impunity in apparent righteousness of the law on privilege, as they at the same time, were effective in persuading the poor to live with joyful resignation in his own misery. Moreover, it is understandable that the "Christianity" has broad support from the apparatus of bureaucratic power in what has been shown to work as a valuable tool for controlling the masses through the irresistible psychological effect resulting from the alleged divine investiture of power, as well as the provision to the exploitation of hope of eternal happiness otherworldly. The government organization continues to consider religion as a fundamental tool for the maintenance of state power over the people. In the final analysis, there is no doubt that the "religion" has no other purpose than to consolidate the common interests between the managers of the 'governmental organization "and the managers of the' religious organization" continue with impunity to make themselves responsible for any kind of illegality. The actual misconduct of the Popes were developed in the fourth century, when they demanded the humble and the kiss of the faithful, to progressively worsened over the centuries so that, as stated Deschner (1962), "... From the seventh century [...] came use incense to the Pope rather than the emperor. In the Middle Ages the ambition of the Catholic hierarchy became abnormal and remained such, even the Lateran Treaty, concluded in 1929 between Italy and the Vatican, contain art. 21 the following sentence: "All the cardinals in Italy enjoy the honors due to the Princes of blood. " The total corruption of the Church began with its official recognition under Constantine I [(306-337)] and its successors [especially Theodosius I (378-392) and Theodosius II (401-450)]. Nowadays no one disputes the fact that at that time in the conversion to Christianity was often decisive opportunism and genuine spiritual experience was no longer the rule. [...]. Church contributed to the complete globalization of the influx of the nobility, and after the rise of Christianity in the Religion of the State and its total adjustment to the prevailing social relations began to become not only Christians, but even "clerical", since the clergy were rewarded with privileges of social status more and more attractive. Most of the bishops came to be in a situation so enviable and the most eminent representatives of the Church were not for nothing less than the higher grades of the state bureaucracy. With Siricius (384-399), the "first Pope" whose Decretals year 385 were made directly in the style of imperial decrees, perhaps for the first time he ascended to the "throne of Peter," a representative of the Roman nobility, or in any case his candidate. This coveted position, than anything else Peter never occupied, as a result was never abandoned [...]! In the fifth century conditions imposed on the origin of the clergy grew still further in a circular to the Bishops of Italy, Pope Leo I [440-461] criticized the appointment of clerics in 443 non-recommended "a proper descent [...]". The letters of Pope Symmachus (498-514), from which 502 was formulated in the famous words that the Pope could not be judged by any man, casting an almost incredible disregard for the people, which, however, looked with reverence to his spiritual leaders, like the Jews were against religious aristocracy of the Pharisees, who, in turn, despised the masses, defining the working class "rabble" ("Amen-ha-Arez). [...]. The Church apprese presto dai Romani, facendo proprie parecchie delle loro istituzioni e dei loro principi giuridici. Già nel corso del II secolo sul modello delle assemblee provinciali romane si svilupparono Sinodi Provinciali e le Metropoli delle Province, nelle quali risiedeva il Metropolita in qualità di Arcivescovo della Provincia. Nel III secolo i Sinodi Provinciali si ampliarono diventando Concili, cioè Assemblee di Vescovi di più Province, e ben presto divenne l’organizzazione centrale e periferica e, sul costume romano, diede il titolo di Pontifex Maximus per il Papa, e l’abito dei Sacerdoti Pagani, la Stola. Quindi, costruì il Diritto Canonico secondo il modello romano e ricalcò l’assoluzione nella Confessione the formula language tribune. All the Roman state constitution, now in decay, he moved into the Church. But the Church legitimized internally especially unlimited greed for power: all the struggles of the Curia with the emperors did not refer to matters of faith, but of power. Only then was able to subjugate the entire Middle Ages in the West, sometimes even getting those worldly powers that long sought. More than ten cases in which the Popes impose an interdict to Emperors and Kings, and not less than six monarchs were deposed or threatened with deposition. [...]. The papacy became a world potentate. Gregory VII [1073-1085], of which the Archbishop Liem Bremen wrote, "This man is dangerous to itself the right to command the bishops as were his factors, towards the end of the eleventh century, proclaimed that" only the Pope is in a position to confirm or challenge empires, kingdoms, duchies, counties and generally the possessions of all men, to give them and taking them off, and everything on the merits of each. [...]. Together with the French king Philip Augustus, Pope Innocent III [1198-1216] prepared the invasion of England, promising to all participants in a plenary indulgence [!!]; [...]. During his Pontificate of eighteen around the world sent more than five thousand documents official ed'Inghilterra the kings of France and the German emperor Otto IV were excommunicated, and not merely to incite people against Count Raymond of Toulouse, but left a free hand to the people so that they take control of his land, in as contaminated by heresy [!!]. [...]. The trend is still universal and totalitarian guide the leaders of the Church: the goal, now as then, is world domination. Only the Church could deal with this, since the end of the ancient, continuing the Roman Empire: in fact, it was at first a sort of state within a state, then there was the State itself, as clearly shows the passing of the Pope name Vicarium of Christi, that is "representative" of Christ on earth, at first attributed only to the emperor, while the Pope had to Vicarius Petri, but when the empire collapsed, the Church succeeded in its place, the Pope became, as was the Emperor, Vicarius Christi. [...]. How strange Jesus [if it really existed] with his good news before the reality of this hierarchy with their claims of being Vicari Christi! As screeching their luxurious homes and their courts almost oriental words Jesus would have uttered: "Foxes have holes and birds of the air their nests, and the Son of Man Nor has nowhere to lay his head "Mt VIII, 20). How peculiar to their age-old yearning for ever greater wealth in the light of the exhortation, 'Go, sell what you possess and give to the poor "(Mark X, 21). How strange is their strong exaltation of every episcopal election, of any award, any waiver or any decision promulgated in the light of the order that had given Jesus to the disciples "I have received, freely and for free you have to dispense" (Mt . X, 8). How strange is it their custom to be called the Holy Fathers and Saints, in the face of the warning "no one will call the Father on earth, perché uno solo è il vostro Padre, quello che è nei cieli” (Mt. XXIII, 10). Com’è singolare la continua riaffermazione della loro superiorità sugli altri Vescovi, anzi, su tutti i potenti del mondo, accanto al motto “Se uno vorrà essere il primo, allora sia l’ultimo di tutti e di tutti il servitore” (Mc. IX, 35). Come sono strane le loro millenarie scomuniche, che hanno colpito anche i cristiani più sinceri, di fronte al comandamento “Non giudicate e non sarete giudicati” (Mt. VII, 1). Come sono strane le loro esecuzioni di eretici, i loro roghi di streghe, le persecuzioni antisemite, le guerre di religione a fronte dell’insegnamento di Gesù “Amate i vostri nemici, beneficate chi vi odia, benificate chi vi maledice, pregate per chi vi schernisce” (Lc. VI, 27). […]. A prescindere poi dal fatto che Pietro sia stato a Roma o no, è certo che non ha mai occupato la cathedra Petri. Si tratta di uno dei falsi più vistosi della Chiesa cattolica, la quale spaccia Pietro come primo Papa insediato da Gesù e, di conseguenza, il dominio ereditario assoluto sulla Chiesa dei suoi successori. Sul fondamento di questa sua invenzione i Vescovi di Roma s’arrogano il potere e il diritto assoluti di decidere a piacimento di qualsivoglia questione di fede. In verità, il dogma dell’episcopato universale del Vescovo di Roma e dell’infallibilità in matters of faith was proclaimed only in the Vatican Council of 1870 [...]. Peter was neither the first Bishop of the alleged apostolic succession or, above all, the first Pope in Rome is precisely the charge was imposed episcopal monarchy rather late in the fourth or fifth generation of Christians, and in any case then, in mid- second century, no member of the Community was aware of its establishment by Peter, although it is still true that at the end of the century in Rome he was placed in the group of bishops. But by the mid-fourth century, stated that he had been Bishop of Rome for twenty-five years. And today a Christian bestseller, all over the world, argues that we in possesso di tavole votive e di monete con l’iscrizione di “San Pietro, prega per noi”, risalenti al I secolo: è una pura e semplice invenzione. […]. L’evoluzione linguistica del titolo segue di pari passo quella della Chiesa e mostra altresì come il Vescovo romano divenne una specie di sovrano assoluto da primus inter pares quale era. Il termine Papa (papa = padre), titolo onorifico di tutti i Vescovi a partire dal III secolo, restò in uso sino alla fine del primo millennio. Per distinguere il “Papa” dagli altri “Papi” fin dal V secolo si usò solitamente l’espressione “Papa della città di Roma” oppure “Papa della Città eterna” or "Roman Pope." But then they began to give the "lieutenant of Peter" - term coined only in the fifth century - the predicate of Pope with no other attributes, which the Roman ecclesiastical authorities themselves, moreover, seldom used until the seventh century. Began to define himself as a regular until the end of the eighth century and the beginning of the second millennium, the term "Pope" became the exclusive prerogative of the Bishop of Rome: Gregory VII [1073-1085] in his Dictatus Pope argued that with high-sounding words the title of Pope was unique and thus ought to be exclusive of the Roman Pontiff. In reality it was characteristic for several centuries of Bishops and Patriarch of Alexandria still bears the official title of "Papa". The Catholic Church uses the fiction of apostolic tradition of Petrine primacy and to legitimize the imperialist policy of the Popes, ignoring that the watchword of Jesus [according to the relevant editors of the Gospels] was not "dominate", but "serve" and that this concept characterized the preaching, which, on the other hand, is in striking contrast with the whole practice of the papacy. But the Popes were not limited to justify the claims of first-served spurious pitch of Mt (XVI, 18), but act also [...] made a whole endless supply of false, as the Decretals pseudocirilliche and pseudoisidoriane, hundreds of fake papal letters, decrees of the council and Constitutum Silvestri was just this little book for the Pope more useful than ten imperial diplomas. It is one of the darkest pages of the Roman Catholic Church that the Popes did not give to increasing their power even when it became clear to the world - including the Catholic one - it was not a minor extent due also to these forgeries. [...]. The fulfillment of their ambition was dearly purchased by the "lieutenants of Christ": the first division after a temporary (486-519), in 1054 the whole Christian Church of the East finally broke away from Rome. And after the First Vatican Council (1869-70), who had proclaimed his infallibility when the Pope began to speak ex cathedra, of course, also moved away from the Curia, the bulk of the Christian traditionalists, following on from the 1702 the Church of Utrecht had refused to follow the Popes, not recognizing their "infallibility." It is well known that the dogma of infallibility proclaimed in the First Vatican Council (1869-70) originally was not to be the subject of discussions the council, the grievances of the representatives of the bishops were vain: in vain did these dogmatic errors of previous popes, unnecessarily evoke the negative reaction of the Eastern Church and of Protestantism in particular the announcement of such a dogma, to no avail Bishop Ketteler fell at the feet of the Pope, begging him in tears: "Good Father, save us and save the Church of God." The Pope [Pius IX (1846-1878)] openly favored the advocates of the doctrine papalistica [...] and eventually the opposition [...] was defeated. In January 1870, the bishops opposed to the discussion of the problem of infallibility were still 136 but the opposition gradually vanished: in the secret ballot 451 partecipanti furono favorevoli, 88 contrari e 62 proposero emendamenti. Gli oppositori lasciarono Roma ancora prima della votazione pubblica nella Basilica di S. Pietro, per evitare di porsi in aperto contrasto col Papa, ma dopo l’approvazione accettarono il nuovo dogma…» (cfr. Deschner K.: «Abermals krähte der Hahn. Eine kritiske Kirchengeschichte», Hamburg, 1962), evidentemente, perché faceva loro comodo, per continuare ad ingannare e sfruttare le masse dei fedeli sprovveduti e continuare ad alimentare la loro potente organizzazione politico-capitalistica internazionale! Infatti, se si considerano le enormi somme di capitali movimentate dalle banche di proprietà del “Vaticano” (lo Stato della “Chiesa Cattolica”, chiesa di una religione che pretende di costituire uno stato!) (4) ― la cui polimorfa attività verte in notevoli operazioni finanziarie internazionali, nel controllo e nella diretta gestione delle organizzazioni devolute alla raccolta dei fondi per le popolazioni sottosviluppate, in ingenti investimenti patrimoniali nell’acquisto di beni immobili, nelle recenti vistose campagne pubblicitarie promosse dalla Conferenza Episcopale Italiana (CEI), ecc. ― si deduce che esso è, in realtà, una potente azienda multinazionale tesa ad accumulare ricchezza e capace di condizionare il mercato in ogni paese del mondo! Ciò fa riflettere sulla concretezza della “carità” cristiana sciorinata dalla Chiesa Cattolica poiché tale “carità”, come hanno ben evidenziato Manacorda e Franzoni (1999), «…è quella “carità solidale” che non serve a mutare, ma a conservare i ricchi e i poveri nelle strutture sociali esistenti e a far guadagnare ai ricchi la riconoscenza dei poveri […]. Che, peraltro, lo ha fatto sempre grazie agli aiuti pubblici e privati, dello Stato e degli individui; mai, che si sappia, spogliando le sue ricchissime chiese. È dunque questa la solidarietà della Chiesa? Le parole suonano belle, ma dove sono i fatti? In realtà, questa solidarietà tra diversi ― ricchi e poveri ― destinati a restare tali per always in a global society naturaliter divided between areas of affluence and areas of poverty, which only served to maintain this division, of which promises to end in any way. As the division, it needs to maintain solidarity among the different, so solidarity, to justify himself, he needs the division. The preservation of this diversity "solidarity" between rich and poor is also a division between clergy and laity, [...] from one side, the clergy, opulent wealth [...] the other hand, the vast majority of men, unable to distinguish good from evil. The encyclical on the Spirit and the damage so the company's hand, repeating la divisione tra chi possiede la ricchezza, materiale e spirituale, e chi non possiede né l’una né l’altra…» (cfr. Manacorda M.A., Franzoni G.: «Le ombre di Wojtyla», Roma, 1999). È esemplare il fatto che il Papa Eugenio Pacelli (Pio XII) sia morto (1958) «…con un patrimonio di 80 milioni di marchi [equivalenti a circa 500 milioni di euro attuali (anno 2006)] in oro ed i suoi tre nipoti ne hanno accumulati 120 [equivalenti a circa 750 milioni di euro attuali (anno 2006)] nei diciannove anni (1939-1958) di papato dello zio…» (cfr. Deschner K.: «Ein Jahrhundert Heilsgeschichte. Die Politik der Päpste im Zeitalter der Weltkriege: von Pius XII», Band II, Reimbek bei Hamburg, 1983). In addition, the Catholic Church, just to make money, has no qualms in organizing scams such as the "blessing by mail", endorsed by Pope Paul VI (1963-1978), consists in making its request, by mail, at 'chaplain to receive the Vatican's apostolic blessing at home, at a price of 2,000 pounds of the seventies [equivalent to the current € 20 (2006)] on plain paper if desired, and as many as 30,000 pounds of the seventies [equivalent to 300 euro current (2006)] on parchment if desired (see C. Rendina, "The Popes, history and secrets," Rome, 2001)! It has always been hampered to know the immense wealth that has the "Holy See" because, as demonstrated by Nichols (1968), "... or the assets of the Vatican is so vast that it is better not to make him known to the faithful less willing to help the Church, or is invested in areas economic activity (especially in Italy) who know too much about pure speculation, and perhaps also of dubious use. [...] The Administration of Patrimony of the Apostolic [...] is the first major financial and administrative institutions that have been established [...]. The Papacy knows [...] what it means to possess great wealth. [...]. Skillful management of this capital Basic has made the Vatican a top world financial powers. Do not you ever publish budgets, do not ever give information about direct investment ... "(see P. Nichols," The Politics of the Vatican, "London, 1968). Therefore, the "Vatican" is configured as headquarters of a criminal organization legalized and well-protected dall'efficacissima camouflage cover, consisting of ostentatious beneficial actions, cleverly interwoven and constantly reinforced by the "political government" (5).
From the foregoing, you must give credit to the eminent judge Luigi Tosti, who, with the courage which unites him to the real benefactors of humanity, effectively put in evidence as the "crucified" - which continues to be shamelessly hung, without any restraint, in the walls of classrooms, courts, etc.. - Is nothing more than "... the flagship of the largest criminal organization and the largest gang of counterfeiters in the history of the planet, the Catholic Church, which has become an author, in about 1800 years, the most heinous crimes against humanity, sharing of Pope in the Pope, without showing any remorse motion and / or repentance. The story of the "crucified" drips with blood, genocide, assassination, torture, the criminal inquisition, Crusades of criminals, of criminal racism, crime against burning heretics and witches, criminal slavery, superstition, discrimination, crime and racial persecution, Shoah of criminal, criminal kidnapping of Jewish children, Native American genocide criminals, criminals seizures of contempt and discrimination against women and homosexuals, homophobia, sexual phobia of pathological intolerance, obscurantism, and abuse of violation of the most basic political rights and human equality, freedom of opinion, freedom of thought, freedom of religion and freedom of science and research, coverage of the criminal code of silence and pedophile priests [cf. Liggio F.: "Papi felon. Pedophilia, homosexuality and crimes of the Catholic Clergy, "Clinamen Editrice, Florence, 2009], false birth of Jesus Christ, the fraudulent donations of Constantine, the fraudulent and deceptive of scripture, creation of false, false relics, false Christs , false "children" of God, resurrection of false, false foreskins of Jesus Christ (even 13!) [actually Mascardi Nicole Hermann-famous expert on relics, has tracked down in France alone in "seventy sanctuaries" !], [false two navels of Jesus are revered in France at Chalons and Lucques, and one in Italy, in Rome, the Church of St. Maria del Popolo, where there would be received by falling from the sky!], the "blood of San Gennaro," false veil of the Madonna [Madonna's underwear false], false apparitions of Our Lady of false Madonnas that weep blood, false hosts which turn into blood Florence, false case of Our Lady of Loreto, false nails of the cross of Jesus [performed with considerable revenue: in Italy only if they are numerous now distributed in various cities (Ancona, Catania, Milan, Naples, Milan, Rome, Venice, etc. .)!], of fake wood of the cross of Jesus [can be counted numerous distributed in many places!], false spears Loncin (Heilige Lanze) venerated by the Catholic Hitler, false shrouds [more than one in Turin there are some forty known (see Stornaiolo U. "secular history of Christianity," Baldness, 1995)!], Veronica, false, false miracles, false exorcisms of stigmata false, false transubstantiation of impostors Pii holy Fathers, false paradises of false purgatory, limbo of false, false demons, false angels, archangels false, false cherubim, seraphim false, false thrones of false possessed, of fraud, of constant abuse of popular credulity for speculative purposes, to put fraudulent Gregorian commercialization of indulgences, of fraudulent sales of medals "miraculous" bubbles composing, of financial impropriety parasitic accumulation of enormous wealth and scandalous and other nonsense. Set out in the courtroom the "crucified", therefore, means sharing all these crimes and identify with the criminal history of the Catholic Church, offending the dignity of those who really believe in the values \u200b\u200bof tolerance, equality and respect for human rights, but above all offending and outraging the memory of the hundreds of millions of human hands "in the name of that symbol" were murdered, tortured, gutted, imprisoned, discriminated against, indicted, ghettoized, prevaricate, duped, swindled, vilified and marginalized by the Catholic Church ... " (L. Tosti, "Request for postponement of the hearing for the appeal RGN 03482400-07", the 18/11/2008).
Ultimately, from the foregoing, it follows that it is a moral obligation to demand the immediate removal from any public place highly negative educational impact of the horrible symbol - consisting of the "crucified" - the most distinctive wicked religion that has as the fundamental object of worship ' coupled "sadistic God the Father" (cruel torturer of violators of its prohibitions, with the eternal fire!) (6) and "God the Son masochistic" (which you submit with delight to the terrible suffering imposed by the sadistic "God the Father" to redeem the transgressions of human beings, however, will be tortured eternally after death and subsequent resurrection!), a religion that teaches us to praise and worship such a sado-masochistic complex similar to what is the most serious part of the perversity sexual psychopathology! It can hardly continue to be so naive as to being influenced by the managers of illogical religion, which lead us to believe a number of obvious absurdity in order to preserve their privileges of power over the masses!
NOTES (1) The term "cult", derived from the Latin verb passive "sequor, secutus sum, Sequi "(" following "," go back "," being dragged ", etc..), is used to describe an association of minority recruits that is separated by a predominant religious confession already established and initially tends to take on characteristics of criminals Depending on the availability of proselytism in which charismatic organizers applied against followers of a gradual manipulation to be attributed supernatural abilities and to be venerated as having "salvation". The members themselves are convinced to become bearers of "salvation" for all humanity despite being subjected to absurd rituals and governing exhausting. They end up reducing their social contacts with friends, acquaintances and relatives, however, are under pressure to meet them to try to convert the distribution of leaflets, events missionary, etc.. But soon the adepts are obliged to pay contributions for the achievement of salvation is made dependent on rising costs, so that members are encouraged to continually beg and ask for contributions, having been obliged to deliver to managers throughout their heritage, just as was done with the first recruits of the "Christianity" rookie. Those who attempt to disband the sectarian movement is threatened with severe punishment and also under divine to corporal punishment of any kind to even murder.
(2) This episode, most likely, was invented by the author of "Acts" to intimidate to deter subsequent followers to retain for himself some of their goods and not deliver all the organizers of the sectarian community. However, it is possible, if the incident had actually occurred, that the poor couple Ananias and Sapphire have been forced to take a poison potion before being publicly questioned, since it was believed that if the individual was innocent and had survived be done (see, for example. "Proto of James XVI, 1-3;" Pseudo Matteo” XII, 1-5; ecc.)!
(3) La mancanza di riferimenti concernenti il personaggio Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Gesù [il “Cristo”] Figlio di Giuseppe) nei testi non contraffatti degli storici dell’epoca e le sorprendenti notevoli contraddizioni riscontrabili nelle narrazioni evangeliche hanno da tempo convinto gli studiosi più esperti a dover negare la reale sua esistenza storica. Il primo di questi fu, senz’altro, Etienne Dolet (1509-1546) il quale, per avere sostenuto che “Gesù-Cristo” è “un’entità inventata come testimoniano numerose contraddizioni ed omissioni”, è stato fatto bruciare vivo a Lione dal Papa Paolo III (1534-1549), con ruling of the court of the "Holy Inquisition", along with his books, and his family was left destitute. Lucilius Vanini (1585-1619), forerunner of absolute Charles Darwin (1809-1882) being the first to hypothesize that humans and monkeys were able to descend from a single common ancestor, for arguing that the figure of Bar-Yeschuah Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph) is an invention of the founders of "Christianity" ("untianesimo" = "messianism") (see Vanini GC [Julius Caesar used as peseudonimo Lucille] "Amphitheatrum aeterne Providentiae Divine-Magicum ", Lyon 1615, and De amirandis naturae reginae deaeque Mortalium Arcanis, "Paris, 1616, etc..) arrest was made in Toulouse, under the papacy of Pope Paul V (1605-1621) and order from the court of the" Holy Inquisition "to" cutting off the tongue, followed from killing by strangulation and burning the body at the stake! The confirmation that the hoped-awaited "Messiah" (the "Christ" = l '"Anointed One") was the Jewish historical context - personified in Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph) from the dignitaries of the "movement Christian, skilled counterfeiters, the need for socio-political cohesion of the masses poor - it can be deduced from the fact that all the eminent prelates who, from the outset are able to be members of the church hierarchy, have always been aware dell'utilitaristica political creation of the "story of Jesus Christ" so that even Pope Leo X (1513-1521) "... In a letter addressed to Cardinal Bembo [...] had hinted clearly the innermost thoughts of the Catholic Church when he wrote" It has been known since ancient times there has been useful to the story of Jesus Christ ... "(see P. Rodríguez:" Mentiras fundamentales de la Iglesia católica ", Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1997). Now is definitely proved that there is no historical Yeschuah Bar-Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph) as clearly documented in Art. LXXVII. THE STORY OF "NON historical" YESCHUAH Bar-Yosef (Jesus [the "Christ"] Son of Joseph) of the site www.fernandoliggio.org.
(4) In this regard, we must mention the IOR, that is, "Institute for Works of Religion" (!!), name of the main Vatican Bank, which was made through the illegal export of foreign currency from Italy, and that, among other things, invested capital in the Casino of Monte Carlo, in the di armi da fuoco Beretta, in un’industria canadese di contraccettivi orali, ecc. (cfr. Morgan-Witts M., Gordon.T.: «Dentro il Vaticano», Ed. it., Napoli, 1989). Inoltre, la Banca Vaticana, già trent’anni fa, gestiva un capitale lordo superiore a 1 miliardo di dollari tanto che «... I suoi profitti annuali, nel 1978, erano superiori a 120 milioni di dollari; per l’85 per cento erano appannaggio del papa che li adoperava come meglio credeva. I suoi conti correnti erano più di 11.000 […], solo 1.047 appartenevano agli ordini e agli istituti religiosi, 312 alle parrocchie e 290 alle diocesi. I rimanenti 9.351 erano di proprietà di diplomatici, prelati, e “cittadini privilegiati”; a large number of members of the latter category were not Italian citizens. Four of these were Sindona ["... Paul VI would have called Shroud, with his plan to increase capital, the Vatican just as Christ had multiplied the loaves and fishes," a man sent from God ... "(see D. Willey" God's Politician ", London, 1992)], Calvi, Gelli and Ortolani. Other accounts were owned by leading politicians of any party and big businessmen. Many owners used the facilities as a covert channel through which illegally exporting currency out of Italy. Any deposit made was not subject to any taxation [is Think of it as a wicked religion can help determine the economic collapse of a nation!] ... "(see D. Yallop," In God's name ', London, 1984).
(5) The "political government" is, like the mythical "Cerberus," a monster with three heads. These heads are composed of three active organizations among them compliant: 1) 's "criminal organization", 2)' s "government organization", 3) the 'religious organization. " The central organization, the government, it necessarily supports the other two organizations on the support side. Therefore, the 'organization government, while potentially being able to easily remove permanently the other two, only to flaunt a continuous control over the first exasperating (l '"criminal organization"), maintaining the level of action limited to the degree of its convenience and, in turn , agrees to be a disguised control by the third (the 'religious organization ") in order to ensure the protection and benefit of other significant benefits, not surprisingly, always end in order to be at the expense of unsuspecting governments!
(6) As well documented by Deschner (1986-2000) "... This is the God who acts against the background of the history of Christianity a tyrannical God as anyone else to those created by earlier religions and characterized by cruelty remained, even later, surpassed. And yet, even today, people claim to believe in him, to pray, to die for him. It is a God so bloodthirsty to sweep away all the other [...]. God is a foaming with jealousy and revenge, which does not allow for any tolerance, any other religion ... "(see Deschner K.," des Christentums Kriminalgeschichte ", Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1986-2000). This "God the Father, the Holy Bible, is revealed as delinquent to order the execution of many mass murderers with the following cry that would dwarf Pu brutal dictators in human: "... and \\ Kastanio and \\ pi central skeuvn MHV th` "ejxoleqreuvsew" EJN `ceiriV aujtou. ajpokteivnate eij" ejxavleiyin presbuvteron kaiV vneanivskon kaiV parqevnon kaiV nhvpia kaiv guna ka `" ... '(' ... each instrument has the destructive [= the weapon] in his hand. [...] to kill and utterly destroy the old and the young and the young child and woman ... ") (Ezekiel IX, 1-6)!
0 comments:
Post a Comment